Wk 10 viewership
>> Week 10 TV Ratings (Average Viewership)
Saturday, June 1
Michigan-Birmingham, 2 pm ET (ESPN): 754k
San Antonio-St.Louis, 4 pm ET (FOX): 836k
Sunday, June 2
Arlington-D.C., Noon ET (ABC): 893k
Houston-Memphis, 7 ET (FOX): 649k <<
per MM
Overall VERY SOLID Numbers ESPN overperformed. ABC was hoping for low 900's but Net Net - NICE WEEK!
Week Avg 783k!
UFL 2024 YTD and Reg season Avg = 817
2023 Reg Season:
USFL = 604k
XFL = 617k (with opening game simulcast as 1 game)
2022 Reg Season:
USFL = 713k (with opening game simulcast as 1 game)
Anyway you slice it BIG increase
>> Week 10 TV Ratings News On FOX
Saturday’s St. Louis-San Antonio game averaged 836,000 viewers. Up 31% vs. last year’s equivalent Week 10 USFL average of 637,000 viewers for Birmingham-Memphis on FOX. The Telecast peaked with 1,674,000 viewers from 7-7:14pm.
Sunday night’s Houston-Memphis game averaged 649,000 viewers, peaking at 1,147,000 viewers from 10-10:14 pm.<<
Almost verbatim with my predictions. I'll take that.
Wk 10 viewership - Updated
-
- MVP
- Posts: 3841
- Joined: Wed Aug 14, 2019 8:42 pm
Re: Wk 10 viewership - Updated
Didn't get my ballpark fig (comp to WNBA) but works nonetheless.
Speaking of the W they're in trouble, CC vs Angel Reese I gets 60% of what they pulled for the draft? No wonder they're hyping up this "shoulderblock heard around the world". They're really getting to be ArenaFan circa 2013-14 and I hope we're taking note.
Speaking of the W they're in trouble, CC vs Angel Reese I gets 60% of what they pulled for the draft? No wonder they're hyping up this "shoulderblock heard around the world". They're really getting to be ArenaFan circa 2013-14 and I hope we're taking note.
-
- MVP
- Posts: 7486
- Joined: Sun Nov 24, 2019 2:27 pm
Re: Wk 10 viewership - Updated
MGB01 wrote: ↑Tue Jun 04, 2024 12:38 pm Didn't get my ballpark fig (comp to WNBA) but works nonetheless.
Speaking of the W they're in trouble, CC vs Angel Reese I gets 60% of what they pulled for the draft? No wonder they're hyping up this "shoulderblock heard around the world". They're really getting to be ArenaFan circa 2013-14 and I hope we're taking note.
Not sure what ArenaFan reference is but all the Caitlan hits are getting news and getting the other players in the news... All News is good news. Best WNBA year in 22 years based on one player won't last for ever. But can UFL sign Tom Brady?
-
- MVP
- Posts: 7486
- Joined: Sun Nov 24, 2019 2:27 pm
ESPN and FOX PR Tweets on Wk 10
Leagues pumping and pimping results
-
- MVP
- Posts: 3841
- Joined: Wed Aug 14, 2019 8:42 pm
Re: Wk 10 viewership - Updated
4th&long wrote: ↑Tue Jun 04, 2024 1:58 pmMGB01 wrote: ↑Tue Jun 04, 2024 12:38 pm Didn't get my ballpark fig (comp to WNBA) but works nonetheless.
Speaking of the W they're in trouble, CC vs Angel Reese I gets 60% of what they pulled for the draft? No wonder they're hyping up this "shoulderblock heard around the world". They're really getting to be ArenaFan circa 2013-14 and I hope we're taking note.
Not sure what ArenaFan reference is but all the Caitlan hits are getting news and getting the other players in the news... All News is good news. Best WNBA year in 22 years based on one player won't last for ever. But can UFL sign Tom Brady?
The ArenaFan reference was back to when Adam Markowitz ran the site and it devolved into a bunch of attention-starved puppies, even the regulars, hungry for any bit of attention they could get from mainstream media. The worst was the Kiss debacle, as if that was going to do anything for the league--when all it did was help keep Stanley/Simmons' overrated careers going for another near-decade.
Not too much different here. What does physicaling do for the league? Nothing. This is the year they're moving up (or supposed to anyway) from the same relevancy as MLS and yet............................I mean what's next Jesse "We hit here!" followed by Boz "She paid the price for that one!"?
Not too much different here. What does physicaling do for the league? Nothing. This is the year they're moving up (or supposed to anyway) from the same relevancy as MLS and yet............................I mean what's next Jesse "We hit here!" followed by Boz "She paid the price for that one!"?
-
- MVP
- Posts: 7486
- Joined: Sun Nov 24, 2019 2:27 pm
Re: Wk 10 viewership - Updated
MGB01 wrote: ↑Tue Jun 04, 2024 9:47 pm4th&long wrote: ↑Tue Jun 04, 2024 1:58 pmMGB01 wrote: ↑Tue Jun 04, 2024 12:38 pm Didn't get my ballpark fig (comp to WNBA) but works nonetheless.
Speaking of the W they're in trouble, CC vs Angel Reese I gets 60% of what they pulled for the draft? No wonder they're hyping up this "shoulderblock heard around the world". They're really getting to be ArenaFan circa 2013-14 and I hope we're taking note.
Not sure what ArenaFan reference is but all the Caitlan hits are getting news and getting the other players in the news... All News is good news. Best WNBA year in 22 years based on one player won't last for ever. But can UFL sign Tom Brady?The ArenaFan reference was back to when Adam Markowitz ran the site and it devolved into a bunch of attention-starved puppies, even the regulars, hungry for any bit of attention they could get from mainstream media. The worst was the Kiss debacle, as if that was going to do anything for the league--when all it did was help keep Stanley/Simmons' overrated careers going for another near-decade.
Not too much different here. What does physicaling do for the league? Nothing. This is the year they're moving up (or supposed to anyway) from the same relevancy as MLS and yet............................I mean what's next Jesse "We hit here!" followed by Boz "She paid the price for that one!"?
I see. Well certainly Clark is having an impact on TV for her games at least. I think the physical stuff on her is more for attention to the offender not the WNBA itself, at least that's the driver. LA Kiss - Oh boy that was interesting!