Wk 10 viewership - Updated

United Football League (2024) Discussion
Post Reply
4th&long
MVP
Posts: 7486
Joined: Sun Nov 24, 2019 2:27 pm

Wk 10 viewership - Updated

Post by 4th&long »

Wk 10 viewership

>> Week 10 TV Ratings (Average Viewership)
Saturday, June 1
Michigan-Birmingham, 2 pm ET (ESPN): 754k
San Antonio-St.Louis, 4 pm ET (FOX): 836k
Sunday, June 2
Arlington-D.C., Noon ET (ABC): 893k
Houston-Memphis, 7 ET (FOX): 649k <<
per MM



Overall VERY SOLID Numbers ESPN overperformed.  ABC was hoping for low 900's but Net Net - NICE WEEK!
Week Avg 783k!

UFL 2024 YTD and Reg season Avg = 817
  2023 Reg Season:
  USFL = 604k
  XFL = 617k (with opening game simulcast as 1 game)
 2022 Reg Season:
  USFL = 713k (with opening game simulcast as 1 game)

Anyway you slice it BIG increase



>> Week 10 TV Ratings News On FOX
Saturday’s St. Louis-San Antonio game averaged 836,000 viewers. Up 31% vs. last year’s equivalent Week 10 USFL average of 637,000 viewers for Birmingham-Memphis on FOX.    The Telecast peaked with 1,674,000 viewers from 7-7:14pm.

Sunday night’s Houston-Memphis game averaged 649,000 viewers, peaking at 1,147,000 viewers from 10-10:14 pm.<<

Almost verbatim with my predictions.  I'll take that.


 
MGB01
MVP
Posts: 3841
Joined: Wed Aug 14, 2019 8:42 pm

Re: Wk 10 viewership - Updated

Post by MGB01 »

Didn't get my ballpark fig (comp to WNBA) but works nonetheless.

Speaking of the W they're in trouble, CC vs Angel Reese I gets 60% of what they pulled for the draft? No wonder they're hyping up this "shoulderblock heard around the world". They're really getting to be ArenaFan circa 2013-14 and I hope we're taking note.
4th&long
MVP
Posts: 7486
Joined: Sun Nov 24, 2019 2:27 pm

Re: Wk 10 viewership - Updated

Post by 4th&long »

MGB01 wrote: Tue Jun 04, 2024 12:38 pm Didn't get my ballpark fig (comp to WNBA) but works nonetheless.

Speaking of the W they're in trouble, CC vs Angel Reese I gets 60% of what they pulled for the draft? No wonder they're hyping up this "shoulderblock heard around the world". They're really getting to be ArenaFan circa 2013-14 and I hope we're taking note.

 
Not sure what ArenaFan reference is but all the Caitlan hits are getting news and getting the other players in the news... All News is good news.  Best WNBA year in 22 years based on one player won't last for ever.  But can UFL sign Tom Brady?  :lol:
4th&long
MVP
Posts: 7486
Joined: Sun Nov 24, 2019 2:27 pm

ESPN and FOX PR Tweets on Wk 10

Post by 4th&long »





Leagues pumping and pimping results
MGB01
MVP
Posts: 3841
Joined: Wed Aug 14, 2019 8:42 pm

Re: Wk 10 viewership - Updated

Post by MGB01 »

4th&long wrote: Tue Jun 04, 2024 1:58 pm
MGB01 wrote: Tue Jun 04, 2024 12:38 pm Didn't get my ballpark fig (comp to WNBA) but works nonetheless.

Speaking of the W they're in trouble, CC vs Angel Reese I gets 60% of what they pulled for the draft? No wonder they're hyping up this "shoulderblock heard around the world". They're really getting to be ArenaFan circa 2013-14 and I hope we're taking note.





 
Not sure what ArenaFan reference is but all the Caitlan hits are getting news and getting the other players in the news... All News is good news.  Best WNBA year in 22 years based on one player won't last for ever.  But can UFL sign Tom Brady?  :lol:
The ArenaFan reference was back to when Adam Markowitz ran the site and it devolved into a bunch of attention-starved puppies, even the regulars, hungry for any bit of attention they could get from mainstream media. The worst was the Kiss debacle, as if that was going to do anything for the league--when all it did was help keep Stanley/Simmons' overrated careers going for another near-decade.

Not too much different here. What does physicaling do for the league? Nothing. This is the year they're moving up (or supposed to anyway) from the same relevancy as MLS and yet............................I mean what's next Jesse "We hit here!" followed by Boz "She paid the price for that one!"?
4th&long
MVP
Posts: 7486
Joined: Sun Nov 24, 2019 2:27 pm

Re: Wk 10 viewership - Updated

Post by 4th&long »

MGB01 wrote: Tue Jun 04, 2024 9:47 pm
4th&long wrote: Tue Jun 04, 2024 1:58 pm
MGB01 wrote: Tue Jun 04, 2024 12:38 pm Didn't get my ballpark fig (comp to WNBA) but works nonetheless.

Speaking of the W they're in trouble, CC vs Angel Reese I gets 60% of what they pulled for the draft? No wonder they're hyping up this "shoulderblock heard around the world". They're really getting to be ArenaFan circa 2013-14 and I hope we're taking note.

 
Not sure what ArenaFan reference is but all the Caitlan hits are getting news and getting the other players in the news... All News is good news.  Best WNBA year in 22 years based on one player won't last for ever.  But can UFL sign Tom Brady?  :lol:
The ArenaFan reference was back to when Adam Markowitz ran the site and it devolved into a bunch of attention-starved puppies, even the regulars, hungry for any bit of attention they could get from mainstream media. The worst was the Kiss debacle, as if that was going to do anything for the league--when all it did was help keep Stanley/Simmons' overrated careers going for another near-decade.

Not too much different here. What does physicaling do for the league? Nothing. This is the year they're moving up (or supposed to anyway) from the same relevancy as MLS and yet............................I mean what's next Jesse "We hit here!" followed by Boz "She paid the price for that one!"?
I see.   Well certainly Clark is having an impact on TV for her games at least.  I think the physical stuff on her is more for attention to the offender not the WNBA itself, at least that's the driver.  LA Kiss - Oh boy that was interesting!
Post Reply