USFL news
Posted: Sun Nov 21, 2021 7:56 pm
Good catch Herns!herns wrote: ↑Sun Nov 21, 2021 7:56 pm https://twitter.com/usfl/status/1462582 ... 80225?s=21
USFL will be on the herd tomorrow
I think this is their first from fox. Pereira mentioned the USFL on pat mcafees show about a month ago but it wasn’t much4th&long wrote: ↑Sun Nov 21, 2021 10:08 pmGood catch Herns!herns wrote: ↑Sun Nov 21, 2021 7:56 pm https://twitter.com/usfl/status/1462582 ... 80225?s=21
USFL will be on the herd tomorrow
Has anyone seen any USFL promos on Fox Sports yet?
That article didn’t just seem anti spring football, there was some lines that were just anti footballlaxtreme56 wrote: ↑Tue Nov 23, 2021 1:07 pm Pretty skeptical from Sports Illustrated.
https://www.si.com/nfl/talkoffame/nfl/f ... 8saNkkTRgM
"Are you ready for some (more) football? FOX is literally betting that you are even though you keep saying you aren’t."
The Stars underperformed in attendance in the old USFL, given the outstanding teams it had. It played boring football but that's forgiven in the Northeast as long as you win.
When he starts off with the years-old "Trump bankruptcy" tripe (when the league was already tens of millions in the hole when he got in) you know what you're in for, and, as expected, it's not good.herns wrote: ↑Tue Nov 23, 2021 2:04 pmThat article didn’t just seem anti spring football, there was some lines that were just anti footballlaxtreme56 wrote: ↑Tue Nov 23, 2021 1:07 pm Pretty skeptical from Sports Illustrated.
https://www.si.com/nfl/talkoffame/nfl/f ... 8saNkkTRgM
"Are you ready for some (more) football? FOX is literally betting that you are even though you keep saying you aren’t."
There's not a league in existence that ever expanded by 12 teams. Merger, sure, but not actual expansion (the NBA doubled back in the late 60s, but the most they ever added in one season was three). I'm sure he gets the "Well he meant by six to 18" benefit of the doubt hereAfter its inaugural season the USFL looked like it might have found a niche for itself but its owners, led by the blustering Trump, quickly overreached, expanding from six teams to 18 despite receiving only $13 million in annual television revenue.
I think the Stars were basically kicked out of the Vet; they didn't really want to leave. College Park is firmly in the D.C. metro area. As if wearing a star on the helmet and the name Baltimore in D.C. wasn't bad enough, they had to follow the Federals and to deal with the Redskins, who were aggressively anti-USFL.super390 wrote: ↑Tue Nov 23, 2021 9:32 pm It's forgotten that it moved to "Baltimore" in 1985 to supposedly avoid head-to-head competition with the Eagles in the planned switch to fall. But it didn't draw well anyplace at all. In reality its new home was the Univ. of Maryland's stadium on the border of the District of Columbia. You can actually get there using the DC subway system, so it was closer to the District than Redskins Park. Thus this still put it in conflict with an NFL market, and it went badly.